<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ‘Branding’ New Designer at Dusted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/branding-new-designer-at-dusted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/branding-new-designer-at-dusted/</link>
	<description>The Blog for Dusted Design Partners Limited</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/branding-new-designer-at-dusted/#comment-1742</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/branding-new-designer-at-dusted/#comment-1742</guid>
		<description>My initial view was that slogan competitions are nothing new - think cereal packets.  However, I feel it has gone beyond that; it could be that companies have identified that the customer has greater control of the brand as a result of the advent of social media.

With the rise of internet blogs (like this) and online social networks maybe companies have decided "they're going to review our brand anyway, let's try and be proactive"

This approach allows the company to engage in a dialogue with their customer and get some (and I say some) feedback.   The feedback could be polarised in that respondents are likely to be advocates of the brand, or anti-brand.

My final thought is that any company that thinks it is fully in control of its brand and can dictate what the customer ultimately feels is heading for a fall.   The marketers’ opinion is never as important as the customers - so engage with them more I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial view was that slogan competitions are nothing new - think cereal packets.  However, I feel it has gone beyond that; it could be that companies have identified that the customer has greater control of the brand as a result of the advent of social media.</p>
<p>With the rise of internet blogs (like this) and online social networks maybe companies have decided &#8220;they&#8217;re going to review our brand anyway, let&#8217;s try and be proactive&#8221;</p>
<p>This approach allows the company to engage in a dialogue with their customer and get some (and I say some) feedback.   The feedback could be polarised in that respondents are likely to be advocates of the brand, or anti-brand.</p>
<p>My final thought is that any company that thinks it is fully in control of its brand and can dictate what the customer ultimately feels is heading for a fall.   The marketers’ opinion is never as important as the customers - so engage with them more I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
