<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mince pie charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/mince-pie-audit-2009-the-result/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/mince-pie-audit-2009-the-result/</link>
	<description>The Blog for Dusted Design Partners Limited</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 10:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Caspersz</title>
		<link>http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/mince-pie-audit-2009-the-result/comment-page-1/#comment-20521</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Caspersz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/?p=1190#comment-20521</guid>
		<description>Can I propose a champagne test this year?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I propose a champagne test this year?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/mince-pie-audit-2009-the-result/comment-page-1/#comment-18041</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dusteddesign.com/blog/?p=1190#comment-18041</guid>
		<description>The biggest surprise (for me at least) was Greggs. Maybe this is because expectations were so low, which I guess directly relates to brand values and reputation. Speaking of which, Duchy had a lot to live up to, again, due to the expectations of the brand... Which, in turn (almost) justified their high price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest surprise (for me at least) was Greggs. Maybe this is because expectations were so low, which I guess directly relates to brand values and reputation. Speaking of which, Duchy had a lot to live up to, again, due to the expectations of the brand&#8230; Which, in turn (almost) justified their high price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

